Negligence in District of Columbia
State-specific overview · Tort Law
DC applies traditional negligence law with a modified comparative fault rule that bars recovery if plaintiff is 50% or more at fault.
How District of Columbia treats Negligence
District of Columbia recognizes negligence claims when a defendant breaches a duty of reasonable care, causing injury. DC follows a modified comparative negligence standard: a plaintiff can recover damages only if their own negligence is less than 50 percent of the total negligence causing the injury. If the plaintiff is found 50 percent or more at fault, they recover nothing. Courts in DC also recognize the "reasonable person" standard to determine whether conduct meets the duty of care.
The general definition of Negligence
Failure to exercise reasonable care that results in harm to another person.
Negligence is a legal concept in civil law (not criminal) that holds people responsible for careless behavior. To prove negligence, you must show four things: the defendant had a duty to be careful, they breached that duty, their breach caused your injury, and you suffered actual damages. Negligence doesn't require intent to harm—it's about failing to act as a reasonably careful person would in similar circumstances. Victims of negligence can sue for compensation to cover medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
Read the full Negligence entry →This page is a plain-English reference and is not legal advice. State laws change frequently. For specific situations consult a licensed attorney in District of Columbia.